Governor Jerry Brown

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Governor’s Proposal to Eliminate California’s Enterprise Zones Missing from Budget Bill

Thursday, June 13th, 2013

California Governor Jerry Brown’s proposals to eliminate and replace the state’s enterprise zone program did not make it into the budget bill, which is scheduled for a vote on Friday, June 14th.  Legislative leaders made it clear earlier this week that they did not have the number of votes required to pass the enterprise zone legislation.

The Governor’s efforts will continue, however, as the changes he desires can be passed through legislation independent of the state’s annual budget. The Brown Administration  is determined to continue pushing for these changes to the state’s tax code.

Governor’s CA Enterprise Zone Proposal Calls for Elimination Not Revision

Thursday, May 23rd, 2013

On May 22, 2013, the California State Assembly’s Budget Subcommittee #4 held a hearing that explored Governor Jerry Brown’s latest economic tax incentive proposals as they relate to the State’s current enterprise zone program. In my previous post on this subject, based solely on the language published in the Governor’s May 2013 budget revision, I concluded that significant “revisions” were the target. The recent hearing makes it abundantly clear, however, that the words “elimination” and “replacement” better describe Governor Brown’s proposal.

Thank you to Max Shenker of TCC (Tax Credit Company) for posting a video of the hearing on Vimeo.

During the hearing, a representative from the Department of Finance offered the Governor’s perspective and responded to questions. After listening through all 69 minutes of the Subcommittee’s discussion and public comments on this issue, I can make the following observations.

The Governor’s proposal would create a new statewide tax incentive program with three prongs:

  1. A revamped hiring credit available to businesses who show a net increase in jobs and hire the long-term unemployed, unemployed veterans, and individuals receiving the federal earned income tax credit. In place of the administrative enterprise zone, the revamped hiring credit would be available to businesses within any census tract with demographics demonstrating a certain level of economic distress (to be defined by the program). 
  2. A new sales tax exemption for manufacturing industries. Unlike the State’s now abandoned Manufacturing Investment Credit (MIC), which offered an income tax credit based on the amount of sales tax paid on manufacturing and production equipment, this replacement would exempt manufactures from paying the State’s portion of the California sales tax (4%).
  3. A tax credit fund administered by the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (aka GO-Biz) that would authorize the agency to offer negotiated tax benefits to businesses moving into or expanding within the State of California.

If you are familiar with California’s current enterprise zone hiring credit, it should be clear to you that this revamped hiring credit would be profoundly different.  Most employers currently benefiting will no longer be eligible for a hiring benefit — if simply because they are not regularly showing a net increase in jobs.

There was no discussion about the how much tax benefit the revamped hiring credit would offer.  Nor was there any discussion about how qualifying employees would be identified, documented, or certified.

Businesses holding existing tax credits could continue to carryover and utilize them for another 5 years.

Other EZ Benefits Not Mentioned
There was no mention of the current enterprise zone program’s other benefits: the Net Interest Deduction, EZ Business Deduction, Net Operating Loss Carryover, or bid preferences for vendors bidding on state fulfillment contracts. It is not clear to me if these would also be eliminated or modified.

Agency Players
The current enterprise zone program is administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). With the proposed changes, HCD could be removed from the picture. The revamped hiring credit would be administered by the Franchise Tax Board. The Sales Tax Exemption would fall to the Board of Equalization.  And, as stated above, the negotiated tax credit fund would be managed by Go-Biz.

 

Governor’s May Budget Revise Proposes Substantial Changes to California Enterprise Zone Program

Tuesday, May 14th, 2013

California Governor Jerry Brown released his May budget revise today, revealing additional intentions for the State’s enterprise-zone program.

From page 68:

“The [enterprise zone] hiring credit will be refocused to specific areas with high unemployment and poverty rates. This credit will be available for the hiring of long-term unemployed workers, unemployed veterans, and people receiving public assistance. The Enterprise Zone sales tax program will be expanded to a statewide, upfront sales tax exemption for manufacturing or biotech research and development equipment purchases.”

This budget document does not specify how these changes might be accomplished. It is clear to me, however, that new legislation would be required because this vision of the program varies substantially from that outlined in current law.

In his 2011-2012 budget proposals, Governor Brown proposed the outright elimination of the enterprise zone program.  He was unsuccessful, however, at overcoming legislators’ opposition to  the program’s death.  Since that time, the California’s legislature has experience a significant change in its membership. Perhaps this time, Governor Brown will be more successful at effectuating these serious although less drastic changes.

Not mentioned in the budget revise are the other enterprise zone tax benefits such as the net operating loss carryover, net-interest deduction for lenders, the business expense deduction and preference points for bidders on certain kinds of state procurement contracts.

UPDATE:  After listening to the California State Assembly Budget Subcommittee  May 22nd hearing on the Governor’s Enterprise Zone proposal, it is crystal clear to all that the Governor intends to replace the Enterprise Zone hiring credit program.  See my May 23 Post.

State Democratic Whip Concerned about Changes to CA Enterprise Zones

Wednesday, February 6th, 2013

California State Assemblyman V. Manuel Perez published an editorial this week, in which he praises many aspects of the Governor Jerry Brown’s budget. He expresses concern, however, about the proposed regulatory changes to the state’s Enterprise Zone program.

“The state’s economic outlook is positive, but we have a way to go to ensure recovery takes hold throughout the state. For this reason, I am concerned about proposed regulatory changes to the state’s Enterprise Zone program.”

Assemblyman Perez chose not to discuss the specific regulatory changes that concern him. My own review of the regulations, however, revealed provisions that will cause significant damage. I intend to discuss these soon in The WOTC Planet.

Assembly V. Manual Perez is the Democratic Whip of the California State Assembly and the former chair of the Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economic Development, and the Economy.

 

Governor Brown’s Budget Includes Significant Regulatory Changes to Enterprise Zone Program

Thursday, January 10th, 2013

California Governor Jerry Brown released his administration’s 2013-14 state-budget proposal today.  Like the 2011-12 proposal of two years ago, this budget includes changes to the state’s  Enterprise Zone hiring credit program.  Unlike that previous attempt, however, the Governor intends to make these changes without the help of the CA legislature.  The changes are based in regulatory power through the Department of Housing and Community Development, which oversees the program statewide.

Warning!  The Governor’s budget summary clearly states that additional changes will also be sought through legislative means.  We do not know yet how far reaching those proposals may be.

Here’s the current proposal, copied directly from pages 151 and 152 of the budget summary released today.

The Budget includes savings relating to new regulations for the Enterprise Zone program.The proposed regulations will accomplish the following reforms:

  • Limit retrovouchering by requiring all voucher applications to be made within one year of the date of hire.
  • Require third party verification of employee residence within a Targeted Employment Area.
  • Streamline the vouchering process for hiring veterans and recipients of public assistance.
  • Create stricter zone audit procedures and audit failure procedures.

These regulatory reforms will primarily affect Corporation Tax revenue, but will also have an impact on Personal Income Tax revenue. The regulations, in total, are expected to increase General Fund revenue by $10 million in 2012-13 and $50 million in 2013-14. The Administration will be pursuing further Enterprise Zone reform through legislation.

My Comments:
The first bullet point will have a large impact on current business practices withing the enterprise zones.  It would limit the time available for retroactive “vouchering” or certification of eligible employees to within one year of their hire date.

Currently, an enterprise zone business that has failed to utilize the program can reach back any number of years to certify eligible employees based on their circumstances at their time of hire.  Since California’s statute of limitations for claiming a tax refund is 4 years, many businesses have used retroactive vouchering to catch up on their eligibility and, as a result, have claimed significant tax refunds from the previous 4 tax returns.

This change alone will have a significant financial impact on enterprise zone businesses. It will also cause some of the consultants who assist them with enterprise-zone related services to go out of business.

Unless someone discovers a statutory or constitutional issue to prevent this procedural change, there is probably very little chance that opponents can defeat it.  Businesses and consultants with an interest in California’s Enterprise Zone program should consider adjusting their expectations accordingly.

Here We Go Again? . . . CA Enterprise Zones to Come Under Fire from Democrat Supermajority

Tuesday, December 18th, 2012

We’ve grown accustomed to California’s Governor and Democrat-controlled legislature’s attempts to curtail the state’s enterprise zone program.  Governor Brown’s 2010 budget proposal included provisions to completely eliminate the program.  Such attempts have consistently failed in the past, while supporters of the program have furthered their own efforts to make the program more effective and accountable.

This successful trend could change in 2013, however, now that Democrats have gained a supermajority in the California legislature.   California’s Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg signaled earlier this month that his party will again be looking at the state’s enterprise zone program as part of their upcoming budget discussion.

During a post swearing-in Dec. 6 news conference, state Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, said the program needs to be looked at as part of legislators’ upcoming budget talks. The state forgoes hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenues annually for enterprise zones — an estimated $450 million in 2006, according to the state’s Legislative Analyst’s Office.

If voting on party-lines, super-majority status will allow the Democrat-control California legislature and Governor’s office to pass comprehensive tax legislation without the cooperation of the Republican legislators.  If Democrats line up together against the enterprise zone program, there will be little its remaining supporters can do to stop detrimental reforms or even elimination of the program.  Fortunately, however, supporters of the program, do included some prominent Democrats.

We will get our first real taste of what’s to come when Governor Jerry Brown issues his budget proposal in January 2013.

Finalized! CA Sequoia Valley Enterprise Zone Designation Completed

Wednesday, January 18th, 2012

The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) announced Tuesday the final designation of the Sequoia Valley Enterprise Zone (EZ). This designation is effective retroactively to October 6, 2010 and will expire in 15 years. Read about it at The Recorder Online.

In September of last year, I reported on some controversy affecting this and eight other “conditionally” designated zones.  California Governor Jerry Brown’s office had instructed HCD to delay the final designation of these zones.  That order has since been retracted and the remaining designations are being processed.

According to the zone’s website, the Sequoia Valley EZ affects the California communities of Cutler/Orosi Dinuba, Ducor, Earlimart, Exeter, Farmersville, Goshen, Ivanhoe, Lindsay, North Delano, Pixley, Poplar, Porterville, Richgrove, Strathmore, Terra Bella, Tipton, Traver, Tulare, Visalia, Woodlake.  However, if your business is located within any other part of Tulare County, don’t rule out eligibility until you have confirmed it with a phone call.

Businesses located within the EZ are eligible for a number of valuable tax incentives including:

EZ Hiring Credit
Firms can earn $37,440 or more in state tax credits for each qualified employee hired

EZ Sales & Use Tax Credit
Sales tax credits on purchases of qualified machinery and parts

Net Operating Loss Carry-forward
Up to 100% Net Operating Loss (NOL) carry-forward (which can be carried forward for 15 years)

EZ Business Expense Deduction
Up-front expensing of certain depreciable property

Net Interest Deduction
Lenders earn tax-free interest on qualifying loans to EZ businesses.

Bid Preferences
EZ vendors can earn preference points on state contracts.

Please feel welcome to contact me with your questions about the State of California’s EZ program, or about this or any other particular CA zone.  I am Vaughn Hromiko, vah@WOTCPlanet.com

 

2012 Predictions for CA’s Enterprise Zone Program

Monday, January 2nd, 2012

It’s January 2, 2012 and so far, not a peep from the Governor’s office about destroying California’s best tax incentive program. So far, so good. Last year at this time, California was holding its breath in anticipation of Governor Jerry Brown’s 2011 budget proposal. Rumors had been leaked that the Governor’s budget would propose the elimination of the state’s Enterprise Zone program.

As it turned out, those rumors were true. A heated political debate ensued that lasted into the summer of 2011. In the end, the Enterprise Zone program was preserved without modifications. The program’s opponents could not muster the votes needed to pass their nefarious legislation.

Since that time, supporters of California’s enterprise zones, like Democratic Assemblyman V. Manuel Pérez, have been pursuing more constructive legislative changes. He was recently asked by The Desert Sun about his political predictions for 2012. Among other things,

Pérez . . . predicts reforms to the state enterprise zone process, “resulting in a more accountable, transparent economic development program serving our neediest communities.”

I hope Assemblyman Pérez is right in his prediction. Reasonable changes that make the program more transparent and effective might also contribute to its continued political stability.

The Governor’s office has directed the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to evaluate potential regulatory changes to the way the enterprise zone program is run. A regulatory approach will not permit the draconian revamping proposed by the Governor in 2011 . . . and might actually produce something beneficial. In any case, HCD’s evaluation appears to still be in a very early phase.

Based on my personal experience with the last set of regulations prepared by HCD for the Enterprise Zone program, it will probably be a year or more before anything concrete is ready. Prove me wrong, HCD. I’m cheering for Assemblyman Pérez to get something decent through the California legislature first.

Grumpy Governor Obstructing CA Enterprise Zone Designations

Saturday, September 3rd, 2011

Denise Madrid of The Porterville Recorder summarized a provocative situation faced by up to nine “conditionally” designated California enterprise zones. Govern Jerry Brown’s office had directed California’s Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), the bureaucracy that oversees the state’s EZ program, to drive with its brakes on.

Conditional-designation status is a normal phase in the lifespan of every new enterprise zone. Nine of the state’s 42 legally designated enterprise zones remain in limbo, however, as HCD delays action required to finalize their status.

The Sequoia Valley EZ, which includes Porterville, Lindsay, Exeter, Visalia, Tulare, Farmersville, Woodlake, and Dinuba and other parts of Tulare County, received its conditional designation status in 2009.

According to The Porterville Recorder,

“Linda Wammack, Porterville development associate, said that the city has learned the HCD is not issuing any final designations at the direction of the governor’s office.”

Wammack said there are nine jurisdictions in a conditionally designated status, two of which have been conditionally designated since 2007, four since 2009, and three since 2010.

“We’re all in limbo,” she said. “We’re all trying to come together for the governor to allow HCD to authorize our documents.”

Now, I don’t really know if Governor Brown is feeling grumpy about all this or not.  It was just this past January that he proposed eliminating the state’s enterprise zone program completely.  He lost that political battle . . .  maybe he just needs more time to get over it.

 

Governor’s Job Creation Proposal Includes Expanding California’s New Jobs Tax Credit

Thursday, August 25th, 2011

Governor Jerry Brown’s proposal today of an expanded tax credit for small businesses incorporates (in amended fashion) a similar proposal put forward in February by California Senate Republican Bill Emmerson of Hemet, California   (see my previous post, herein). 

Both proposals would expand an existing ”new jobs” tax credit that offered $3,000 per job created by small California businesses that employ up to 20 workers.  The proposals would expand the program’s availability to include employers with up to 50 workers.  Governor Brown’s offer, as announced today, would also increase the amount of the tax credit from $3,000 up to $4,000 per new job created.

Brown conditions this expanded yet highly-focused tax break on the passage of a controversial provision mandating the single-sales factor approach for multi-state income apportionment. 

See today’s articles in the Sacramento Business Journal and the San Francisco Chronicle.